- BLACKVOTER.ORG
- Posts
- BlackVoter.Org
BlackVoter.Org
BlackVoter.org
August 12, 2025
In "The Education of a Historian," Eric Foner reflects on his journey through the world of history, shaped profoundly by his family background and the struggles for civil liberties he's witnessed. Growing up with historian parents and intellectuals like W.
E.B.
Du Bois at the dinner table, he learned to view history as a platform for justice—one that often challenges traditional narratives. Foner emphasizes how the Black experience is central to American history, spotlighting the complexities of freedom that have evolved over time.
He critiques the current controversies in education, where historical narratives are either embraced or contested, revealing the ongoing battle to define freedom in modern America. By drawing parallels between past injustices and contemporary struggles, Foner advocates for a richer, more inclusive understanding of history that acknowledges its multifaceted truths and inspires a reinvigorated democracy.
Ultimately, he believes that confronting our past is crucial for building a more equitable future.
In a radical shift, Donald Trump has signaled intentions to strip citizenship from foreign-born Americans, including notable figures like Elon Musk and Rosie O'Donnell, claiming it could target "undesirables." This move, which threatens the citizenship status of over 25 million naturalized citizens, hinges on denaturalization—a process resurrected from historical precedents against those deemed unworthy.
Historically, the U.S.
government utilized denaturalization to remove citizens based on beliefs or actions, but recent Supreme Court rulings support the right of individuals to maintain their citizenship unless they willingly renounce it. Political and legal experts warn that while such threats may not stand in court, they can instill fear among naturalized citizens, potentially stifling dissent.
Trump's push to wield denaturalization as a political weapon raises pressing questions about civil liberties and the definition of "American" in today's polarized climate.
In a thought-provoking piece, Michael Lind argues that the ongoing debates surrounding racial gerrymandering do not signal the demise of the American Republic but herald the rise of a color-blind democracy. He critiques the notion that the Supreme Court's consideration of a Louisiana case threatens minority votes, asserting that racial gerrymandering primarily serves political interests rather than the actual needs of minority voters.
Lind asserts that while the Voting Rights Act of 1965 was designed to eliminate voting barriers, it does not mandate the creation of racially homogenous electoral districts. He suggests that the emphasis should be on representation that aligns with voters' values, irrespective of race, highlighting a shift in voter preferences that moves away from strict racial affiliations.
Ultimately, Lind hopes for a Supreme Court decision that prioritizes individual voting rights over the creation of racially gerrymandered districts, pushing for a truly inclusive political landscape.
The NAACP is revving up its efforts to mobilize Black voters ahead of the crucial 2026 midterm elections, kicking off a series of town halls across the nation this week. NAACP President Derrick Johnson emphasized the urgent need for community engagement, citing current political challenges, including President Trump's rollback of diversity policies and extensive budget cuts affecting healthcare and food assistance.
The town halls aim to inform attendees about these pressing issues, strengthen community ties, and boost civic participation through volunteer recruitment and grassroots organizing. Kicking off in New Jersey, the forums will feature local leaders and are set to expand into states like Texas and California.
As the organization prepares for the elections, they reflect on lessons from past campaigns, aiming to ensure that the Black vote remains a powerful force. The commitment to enhancing voter outreach is crucial in safeguarding democracy and countering any dilution of minority voting power.
In a heated exchange, Texas Governor Greg Abbott recently took aim at Representative Jasmine Crockett, dismissing her warnings about gerrymandering as “racist.” During an appearance on Fox News, Abbott reacted to Crockett's claims that his redistricting efforts would diminish the voting power of Texas's minority communities.
She pointed out that Black voters would only represent one-fifth of their potential influence under the proposed maps, while Latinos would have just one-third. Abbott, however, countered that the new maps would bolster Hispanic representation and claimed Democrats were the ones fixated on race.
The situation has led to a major clash between Texas Democrats and Republicans as they navigate this contentious issue, with Democrats threatening to boycott votes to thwart the redistricting plan. The political landscape in Texas remains electric, and the friction between Abbott and Crockett only adds to the drama.
In a bold move, Donald Trump has taken direct control of Washington D.C.
's Metropolitan Police Department, stripping Mayor Muriel Bowser of her authority. This controversial shift comes under a “crime emergency” declaration, allowing Trump to invoke a rarely used law that applies to the district's unique governance.
With this change, the police can now prioritize federal demands over community needs, impacting local crime prevention strategies, particularly in neighborhoods with significant Black populations. These residents, nearly half of D.
C.'s demographic, are understandably concerned about the implications, especially given Trump's historical rhetoric around law enforcement and racial profiling.
The decision raises alarms about an indefinite federal takeover, highlighting the vulnerabilities faced by D.C.
due to its lack of statehood. As crime dynamics evolve, the community must confront the reality of policing under an administration that may prioritize federal interests over the safety of local neighborhoods.
The recent floods in central Texas tragically highlight the ongoing vulnerability of Black communities, exacerbated by decades of systemic racism and neglect. While flooding affects various neighborhoods, the aftermath often strikes the hardest in historically marginalized areas.
This harsh reality is rooted in discriminatory practices like redlining, which forced Black families into flood-prone zones with subpar infrastructure and little support for recovery.
As climate change heightens flood risks, the disparities become even clearer: Black Americans are disproportionately more likely to live in high-risk areas with inadequate resources and support.
The article calls for urgent action—equitable disaster aid, infrastructure investments in green solutions, and community empowerment in rebuilding efforts. If we don’t address the historical injustices that exacerbate these conditions, we risk repeating a cycle of disaster and neglect.
The Texas floods serve as a rallying cry for reparative justice, demanding that we build back not just better, but fairer.